Список литературы

1. Maharaj D. Assessing Cephalopelvic Disproportion: Back to the Basics. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65(6): 387 - 95.

2. Pavlicev M., Romero R., Mitteroecker P. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222(1): 3 - 16.

3. Milman N., Paszkowski T., Cetin I., Castelo-Branco C. Supplementation during pregnancy: beliefs and science. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016; 32(7): 509 - 16.

4. DeSilva J.M., Rosenberg K.R. Anatomy, Development, and Function of the Human Pelvis. Anat Rec. 2017; 300(4): 628 - 32.

5. Gruss L.T., Schmitt D. The evolution of the human pelvis: changing adaptations to bipedalism, obstetrics and thermoregulation. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015; 370(1663): 20140063.

6. Huseynov A., Zollikofer C.P.E., Coudyzer W., Gascho D., Kellenberger C., Hinzpeter R., et al. Developmental evidence for obstetric adaptation of the human female pelvis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113(19): 5227 - 32.

7. Sheliia G.P., Chavchidze A.T. [Features of physical and sexual development and reproductive behaviour in female adolescents]. Georgian Med News. 2012; (202): 28 - 32.

8. Konje J.C., Ladipo O.A. Nutrition and obstructed labor. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 72(1): 291S - 297S.

9. Malonga F.K., Mukuku O., Ngalula M.T., Luhete P.K., Kakoma J.-B. Etude anthropometrique et pelvimetrique externe chez les nullipares de Lubumbashi: facteurs de risque et score predictif de la dystocie mecanique. Pan Afr Med J. 2018; 31.

10. Bansal S., Guleria K., Agarwal N. Evaluation of Sacral Rhomboid Dimensions to Predict Contracted Pelvis: A Pilot Study of Indian Primigravidae. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2011; 61(5): 523 - 7.

11. Connolly G., McKenna P. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalo-pelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 108(3): 338 - 338.

12. Rozenholc A., Ako S., Leke R., Boulvain M. The diagnostic accuracy of external pelvimetry and maternal height to predict dystocia in nulliparous women: a study in Cameroon. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007; 114(5): 630 - 5.

13. Liselele H.B., Boulvain M., Tshibangu K.C., Meuris S. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 107(8): 947 - 52.

14. Liselele H.B., Boulvain M., Tshibangu K.C., Meuris S. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 107(8): 947 - 52.

15. Liselele H.B., Tshibangu C.K., Meuris S. Association between external pelvimetry and vertex delivery complications in African women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79(8): 673 - 8.

16. Fremondi re P., Thollon L., Adalian P., Delotte J., Marchal F. Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance. Med Princ Pract. 2017; 26(4): 359 - 67.

17. von Bismarck A., Ertl-Wagner B., Stocklein S., Schoppe F., H bener C., Hertlein L., et al. MR Pelvimetry for Breech Presentation at Term-Interobserver Reliability, Incidental Findings and Reference Values. Rofo. 2019; 191(5): 424 - 32.

18. Труфанов Г.Е., Шмедык Н.Ю., Вихтинская И.А., Рязанов В.В., Шмидт А.А., Ипатов В.В., et al. Магнитно-резонансная пельвиметрия: диагностика риска клинически узкого таза и дистоции плечиков в конце третьего триместра беременности. Проблемы женского здоровья. 2014; 9(1): 44 - 51.

19. Акушерство: национальное руководство / под ред. Г.М. Савельевой, Г.Т. Сухих, В.Н. Серова, В.Е. Радзинского. - 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2018. 1088 p.

20. Glinianaia S.V., Rankin J., Pless-Mulloli T., Pearce M.S., Charlton M., Parker L. Temporal changes in key maternal and fetal factors affecting birth outcomes: A 32-year population-based study in an industrial city. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8(1): 39.

21. Zhang J., Landy H.J., Ware Branch D., Burkman R., Haberman S., Gregory K.D., et al. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(6): 1281 - 7.

22. Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87(2): 134 - 45.

23. Чернуха, Е.А., Волобуев, А.И., Пучко Т.К. Анатомически и клинически узкий таз. 2005. 253 p.

24. A.A. Incidence, causes, and maternofetal outcomes of obstructed labor in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis Reprod Health. 2021; 18: 61.

25. Shimelis Fantu, Hailemariam Segni F. Incidence, causes and outcome of obstructed labor in jimma university specialized hospital. Ethiop J Heal Sci. 2010; 20(3): 145 - 51.

26. Tewodros Eshete Wonde A.M. Maternofetal outcomes of obstructed labor among women who gave birth at general hospital in Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019; 12(12(1)): 128.

27. Abraham W., Berhan Y. Predictors of labor abnormalities in university hospital: unmatched case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 256.

28. Suonio S., Saarikoski S., Raty E., Vohlonen I. Clinical assessment of the pelvic cavity and outlet. Arch Gynecol. 1986; 239(1): 11 - 6.

29. Longo L.D. Classic pages in obstetrics and gynecology. Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification. William Edgar Caldwell and Howard Carmen Moloy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 26, pp. 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977; 127(7): 798.

30. Caldwell W.E., Moloy H., D'Esopo D.A. Further Studies on the Peilvic Architecture**Read at a meeting of the New York Obstetrical, Society, March 13, 1934. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1934; 28(4): 482 - 97.

31. А.Ф.П. Терапия родов при узком тазе. Пермь. 1929. 67 p.

32. Калганова Р.И. Ч.В.Н. К вопросу диагностики поперечносуженного таза. АкушГинек. 1978: 53 - 6.

33. Payne P.R. Cephalopelvic Disproportion. Trop Doct. 1997; 27(3): 129 - 30.

34. Arendt E., Singh N.S.C., Oona M.R. Effect of maternal height on caesarean section and neonatal mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of 34 national datasets. Bhutta ZA, editor. PLoS One. 2018; 13(2): e0192167.

35. Alijahan R., Kordi M., Poorjavad M., Ebrahimzadeh S. Diagnostic accuracy of maternal anthropometric measurements as predictors for dystocia in nulliparous women. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014; 19(1): 11 - 8.

36. Л.Н. В. Клинически узкий таз. Медицинский журнал. 2011; 1(35): 133 - 135.

37. Чернуха Е.А. А.Е.В. Диагностика и ведение родов при анатомически и клинически узком тазе. Справочник фельдшера и акушерки. 2016; 6: 25 - 32.

38. Stewart K.S., Philpott R.H. FETAL RESPONSE TO CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION*. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980; 87(8): 641 - 9.

39. Клиническая рекомендация "Нормальная беременность", Российское общество акушеров-гинекологов, одобрено Научно-практическим Советом Минздрава РФ, 2022 г.

40. Клиническая рекомендация "Роды одноплодные, самопроизвольное родоразрешение в затылочном предлежании (нормальные роды)", Российское общество акушеров-гинекологов, одобрено Научно-практическим Советом Минздрава РФ, 2022 г.

41. PONKEY S. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101(5): 915 - 20.

42. SIZER A. Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96(5): 749 - 52.

43. Cheng Y.W., Cheng Y.W., Shaffer B.L., Caughey A.B. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2006; 19(9): 563 - 8.

44. SIZER A. Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96(5): 749 - 52.

45. Cheng Y.W., Cheng Y.W., Shaffer B.L., Caughey A.B. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2006; 19(9): 563 - 8.

46. Tomie V., Bosnjak K., Petrov B., Dikic M., Kne evi D. Macrosomic Births at Mostar Clinical Hospital: A 2-Year Review. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2007; 7(3): 271 - 4.

47. Mikulandra, M Perisa E.S. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section? Zentralbl Gynakol. 1996; (118(8)): 441 - 7.

48. Mahony R., Walsh C., Foley M.E., Daly L., O'Herlihy C. Outcome of Second Delivery After Prior Macrosomic Infant in Women With Normal Glucose Tolerance. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107(4): 857 - 62.

49. Tomic V., Bosnjak K., Petrov B., Dikic M., Knezevi D. Macrosomic Births at Mostar Clinical Hospital: A 2-Year Review. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2007; 7(3): 271 - 4.

50. Feinstein U., Sheiner E., Levy A., Hallak M., Mazor M. Risk factors for arrest of descent during the second stage of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002; 77(1): 7 - 14.

51. Piper J.M., Bolling D.R., Newton E.R. The second stage of labor: Factors influencing duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165(4): 976 - 9.

52. Cheng Y.W., Caughey A.B. Defining and Managing Normal and Abnormal Second Stage of Labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017; 44(4): 547 - 66.

53. Sheiner E., Levy A., Feinstein U., Hershkovitz R., Hallak M., Mazor M. Obstetric risk factors for failure to progress in the first versus the second stage of labor. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2002; 11(6): 409 - 13.

54. Althaus J.E., Petersen S., Driggers R., Cootauco A., Bienstock J.L., Blakemore K.J. Cephalopelvic disproportion is associated with an altered uterine contraction shape in the active phase of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195(3): 739 - 42.

55. Stewart K.S., Philpott R.H. FETAL RESPONSE TO CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION*. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980; 87(8): 641 - 9.

56. Debby A., Rotmensch S., Girtler O., Sadan O., Golan A., Glezerman M. Clinical significance of the floating fetal head in nulliparous women in labor. J Reprod Med. 2003; 48(1): 37 - 40.

57. Debby A., Rotmensch S., Girtler O., Sadan O., Golan A., Glezerman M. Clinical significance of the floating fetal head in nulliparous women in labor. J Reprod Med. 2003; 48(1): 37 - 40.

58. Browne M.A., Crump P., Niven S.J., Teuten E., Tonkin A., Galloway T., et al. Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Woldwide: Sources and Sinks. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(21): 9175 - 9.

59. Franz M., von Bismarck A., Delius M., Ertl-Wagner B., Deppe C., Mahner S., et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295(2): 351 - 9.

60. Sporri S., Thoeny H.C., Raio L., Lachat R., Vock P., Schneider H. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179(1): 137 - 44.

61. Keller T.M., Rake A., Michel S.C.A., Seifert B., Efe G., Treiber K., et al. Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intraobserver error and intraindividual variability. Radiology. 2003; 227(1): 37 - 43.

62. Zaretsky M. V., Alexander J.M., McIntire D.D., Hatab M.R., Twickler D.M., Leveno K.J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pelvimetry and the Prediction of Labor Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(5, Part 1): 919 - 26.

63. Bellussi F., Ghi T., Youssef A., Salsi G., Giorgetta F., Parma D., et al. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217(6): 633 - 41.

64. Molina F.S., Nicolaides K.H. Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27(2): 61 - 7.

65. Ghi T., Bellussi F., Pilu G. Sonographic diagnosis of lateral asynclitism: a new subtype of fetal head malposition as a main determinant of early labor arrest. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45(2): 229 - 31.

66. Eggebo T.M., Hassan W.A., Salvesen K., Torkildsen E.A., Ostborg T.B., Lees C.C. Prediction of delivery mode by ultrasound-assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46(5): 606 - 10.

67. Dall'Asta A., Angeli L., Masturzo B., Volpe N., Schera G.B.L., Di Pasquo E., et al. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221(6): 642.e1 - 642.e13.

68. Malvasi A., Stark M., Ghi T., Farine D., Guido M., Tinelli A. Intrapartum sonography for fetal head asynclitism and transverse position: sonographic signs and comparison of diagnostic performance between transvaginal and digital examination. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25(5): 508 - 12.

69. Yang L., Yi T., Zhou M., Wang C., Xu X., Li Y., et al. Clinical effectiveness of position management and manual rotation of the fetal position with a U-shaped birth stool for vaginal delivery of a fetus in a persistent occiput posterior position. J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(6): 300060520924275.

70. Yang L., Yi T., Zhou M., Wang C., Xu X., Li Y., et al. Clinical effectiveness of position management and manual rotation of the fetal position with a U-shaped birth stool for vaginal delivery of a fetus in a persistent occiput posterior position. J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(6): 300060520924275.

71. Marguier Blanchard I., Metz J.-P., Eckman Lacroix A., Ramanah R., Riethmuller D., Mottet N. Rotation manuelle des varietes posterieures: eat des lieux de la litterature en 2019. Gyn cologie Obs Fertil Senologie. 2019; 47(9): 672 - 9.

72. Phipps H., de Vries B., Hyett J., Osborn D.A. Prophylactic manual rotation for fetal malposition to reduce operative delivery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014; (12): CD009298.

73. Marguier Blanchard I., Metz J.-P., Eckman Lacroix A., Ramanah R., Riethmuller D., Mottet N. [Manual rotation in occiput posterior position: A systematic review in 2019]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019; 47(9): 672 - 9.

74. Phipps H., de Vries B., Hyett J., Osborn D.A. Prophylactic manual rotation for fetal malposition to reduce operative delivery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014; (12): CD009298.

75. Marguier Blanchard I., Metz J.-P., Eckman Lacroix A., Ramanah R., Riethmuller D., Mottet N. [Manual rotation in occiput posterior position: A systematic review in 2019]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019; 47(9): 672 - 9.

76. Wu J.M., Williams K.S., Hundley A.F., Connolly A., Visco A.G. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(2): 525 - 9.

77. Middleton P., Shepherd E., Morris J., Crowther C.A., Gomersall J.C. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2020; 7: CD004945.

78. Клинические рекомендации "Неудачная попытка стимуляции родов (подготовка шейки матки к родам и родовозбуждение)", Российское общество акушеров-гинекологов, одобрено Научно-практическим Советом Минздрава РФ, 2022 г.

79. Boulvain M., Irion O., Dowswell T., Thornton J.G. Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016; (5): CD000938.

80. Magro-Malosso E.R., Saccone G., Chen M., Navathe R., Di Tommaso M., Berghella V. Induction of labour for suspected macrosomia at term in non-diabetic women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJOG. 2017; 124(3): 414 - 21.

81. Ghi T., Eggebo T., Lees C., Kalache K., Rozenberg P., Youssef A., et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52(1): 128 - 39.

82. Быченко В.Г., Кулабухова Е.А., Баев О.Р., Бабич Д.А. Магнитно-резонансная пельвиметрия. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021; 9: 152 - 60.

83. Blasi I., D'Amico R., Fenu V., Volpe A., Fuchs I., Henrich W., et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 35(2): 210 - 5.

84. Dall'Asta A., Rizzo G., Masturzo B., Di Pasquo E., Schera G.B.L., Morganelli G., et al. Intrapartum sonographic assessment of the fetal head flexion in protracted active phase of labor and association with labor outcome: a multicenter, prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225(2): 171.e1 - 171.e12.

85. Vitner D., Paltieli Y., Haberman S., Gonen R., Ville Y., Nizard J. Prospective multicenter study of ultrasound-based measurements of fetal head station and position throughout labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46(5): 611 - 5.

86. Broberg J.C., Caughey A.B. A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic early manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetus at the beginning of the second stage vs expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021; 3(2): 100327.

87. Reichman O., Gdansky E., Latinsky B., Labi S., Samueloff A. Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 136(1): 25 - 8.

88. Le Ray C., Serres P., Schmitz T., Cabrol D., Goffinet F. Manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(4): 873 - 9.

89. Barth W.H. Persistent occiput posterior. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(3): 695 - 709.

90. Методическое письмо МЗ РФ N 15-4/И/2-2570 от 04.03.2020 "Реанимация и стабилизация состояния новорожденных детей в родильном зале".