1. A.P., Ye J., Moller A.-B., Zhang J., A.M., Torloni M.R. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990 - 2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (2): e0148343. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.

2. "Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации", 2019.

3. MacKenzie I.Z., Cooke I. Prospective 12 month study of 30 minute decision to delivery intervals for "emergency" caesarean section. BMJ. 2001; 322 (7298): 1334 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1334.

4. James D. Caesarean section for fetal distress. BMJ. 2001; 322 (7298): 1316 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1316.

5. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 433: Optimal Goals for Anesthesia Care in Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113 (5): 1197 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a6d04f.

6. RCOG. Classification of urgency of caesarean section a continuum of risk. Good Practice No. 11 April 2010.

7. Categorization of urgency for caesarean section RANZCOG July 2018.

8. Методическое письмо Министерство Здравоохранения и социального развития РФ от 6 мая 2014 N 15-4/10/2-3190 "Кесарево сечение. Показания, методы обезболивания, хирургическая техника, антибиотикопрофилактика, ведение послеоперационного периода."

9. Клинические рекомендации "Нормальная беременность" 2023 г. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/288_2.

10. Шмаков Р.Г., Баев О.Р., Пекарев О.Г., Пырегов А.В., Приходько А.М., Павлович С.В. Кесарево сечение. Показания, хирургическая техника, методы обезболивания: учебное пособие. Москва: ООО ИФП "Системные решения"; 2016. - 72 с.;

11. NICE Caesarean section Clinical guideline Published: 23 November 2011. Last updated August 2019.

12. Steer P., Alam M.A., Wadsworth J., Welch A. Relation between maternal haemoglobin concentration and birth weight in different ethnic groups. BMJ. 1995; 310 (6978): 489 - 91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6978.489.

13. Zhou L.M., Yang W.W., Hua J.Z., Deng C.Q., Tao X., Stoltzfus R.J. Relation of hemoglobin measured at different times in pregnancy to preterm birth and low birth weight in Shanghai, China. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148 (10): 998 - 1006. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009577.

14. Chen Y., Han P., Wang Y.-J., Li Y.-X. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 296 (2): 355 - 61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4417-6.

15. Almanzar G., J., Hammerer-Lercher A., Koppelstaetter C., Bernhard D., Prelog M. Influence of the delivery modus on subpopulations and replication of lymphocytes in mothers and newborns. Early Hum Dev. 2015; 91 (12): 663 - 70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.09.010.

16. Young M.F., Oaks B.M., Tandon S., Martorell R., Dewey K.G., Wendt A.S. Maternal hemoglobin concentrations across pregnancy and maternal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019; 1450 (1): 47 - 68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14093.

17. Guidelines for blood grouping and red cell antibody testing during pregnancy. British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Blood Transfusion Task Force. Transfus Med. 1996; 6 (1): 71 - 4.

18. UK Blood Transfusion Services. Guidelines for the Blood Transfusion Service. 8th ed. London: TSO; 2013.

19. Volmink J., Siegfried N.L., van der Merwe L., Brocklehurst P. Antiretrovirals for reducing the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2007; (1): CD003510. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003510.pub2.

20. Read J.S., Newell M.K. Efficacy and safety of cesarean delivery for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2005; (4): CD005479. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005479.

21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Workowski K.A., Berman S.M. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006. MMWR Recomm reports Morb Mortal Wkly report Recomm reports. 2006; 55(RR-11): 1 - 94.

22. Walker G.J. Antibiotics for syphilis diagnosed during pregnancy. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2001; (3): CD001143. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001143.

23. Watson-Jones D., Gumodoka B., Weiss H., Changalucha J., Todd J., Mugeye K., et al. Syphilis in pregnancy in Tanzania. II. The effectiveness of antenatal syphilis screening and single-dose benzathine penicillin treatment for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2002; 186(7): 948 - 57. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/342951.

24. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 8th Edition. ACOG&AAP, 2017.

25. Шапошникова Е.В., Сапрутько О.О. Хронические вирусные гепатиты B и C и беременность: особенности течения и перинатальные исходы. Медицинский альманах. 2014; 4(34): 4C.

26. Wong V.C., Ip H.M., Reesink H.W., Lelie P.N., Reerink-Brongers E.E., Yeung C.Y., et al. Prevention of the HBsAg carrier state in newborn infants of mothers who are chronic carriers of HBsAg and HBeAg by administration of hepatitis-B vaccine and hepatitis-B immunoglobulin. Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet (London, England). 1984; 1 (8383): 921 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92388-2.

27. Xu Z.Y., Liu C.B., Francis D.P., Purcell R.H., Gun Z.L., Duan S.C., et al. Prevention of perinatal acquisition of hepatitis B virus carriage using vaccine: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled and comparative trial. Pediatrics. 1985; 76 (5): 713 - 8.

28. Australasian Society For Infectious Diseases. Management of Perinatal Infections Australasian Society For Infectious Diseases. 2014 Pamela Palasanthiran, Mike Starr, Chery l Jones and Michelle Giles.

29. Smaill F.M. Intrapartum antibiotics for Group B streptococcal colonisation. In: Smaill FM, editor. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1996. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000115.

30. Benitz W.E., Gould J.B., Druzin M.L. Antimicrobial prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: estimates of risk reduction based on a critical literature review. Pediatrics. 1999; 103 (6): e78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.103.6.e78.

31. Minkoff H.L., Sierra M.F., Pringle G.F., Schwarz R.H. Vaginal colonization with Group B beta-hemolytic streptococcus as a risk factor for post-cesarean section febrile morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 142 (8): 992 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90781-5.

32. Antenatal Care. Routine care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. NICE&NCCWCH, RCOG Press 2008.

33. Alfirevic Z., Stampalija T., Medley N. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (4): CD001450. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001450.pub4.

34. Friedman A.M. Maternal early warning systems. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015; 42 (2): 289 - 98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.006.

35. Rodgers S.K., Kirby C.L., Smith R.J., Horrow M.M. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics. 2012; 32 (6): 1693 - 712. https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125516.

36. A., Johns J. The postpartum ultrasound scan. Ultrasound. 2016; 24 (3): 163 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742271X16653779.

37. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva 2018.

38. ASA Physical Status Classification System Committee of Oversight: Economics Approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 15, 2014, and last amended on October 23, 2019.

39. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 764: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133(2): e151 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003083.

40. ACOG committee opinion. Placenta accreta. Number 266, January 2002.

41. RCOG. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green-top Guideline No. 27a. 2019.

42. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133 (2): e110 - 27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.

43. Tahseen S., Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG. 2010; 117 (1): 5 - 19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x.

44. Gambacorti-Passerini Z., Gimovsky A.C., Locatelli A., Berghella V. Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95 (7): 724 - 34. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12920.

45. Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 45 October 2015.

46. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129 (5): e123 - 33. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002043.

47. Tian J., Hu W. Cervical leiomyomas in pregnancy: report of 17 cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 52 (3): 258 - 61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01414.x.

48. The Management of Third - and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears Green-top Guideline No. 29 June 2015.

49. Rouse D.J., Owen J., Goldenberg R.L., Cliver S.P. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. JAMA. 1996; 276 (18): 1480 - 6.

50. J., Dufour P., Vinatier D., Subtil D., S., Monnier J.C., et al. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases > 4500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998; 77 (1): 51 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(97) 00242-x.

51. Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; (1): e18 - 35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003606.

52. Macharey G., M., Gissler M., Ulander V.-M., Rahkonen L., Nuutila M., et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 4 years according to the planned mode of delivery in term breech presentation: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study. J Perinat Med. 2018; 46 (3): 323 - 31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2017-0127.

53. Vlemmix F., Bergenhenegouwen L., Schaaf J.M., Ensing S., Rosman A.N., Ravelli A.C.J., et al. Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93 (9): 888 - 96. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12449.

54. Hofmeyr G.J., Hannah M., Lawrie T.A. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (7): CD000166. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2.

55. Ismail M.A., Nagib N., Ismail T., Cibils L.A. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation. J Perinat Med. 1999; 27(5): 339 - 51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JPM.1999.047.

56. Bergenhenegouwen L., Vlemmix F., Ensing S., Schaaf J., van der Post J., Abu-Hanna A., et al. Preterm Breech Presentation: A Comparison of Intended Vaginal and Intended Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126 (6): 1223 - 30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001131.

57. Robilio P.A., Boe N.M., Danielsen B., Gilbert W.M. Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study. J Reprod Med. 2007; 52 (6): 473 - 9.

58. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 745: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132 (2): e60 - 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002755.

59. Hankins G.D., Hammond T.L., Snyder R.R., Gilstrap L.C. Transverse lie. Am J Perinatol. 1990; 7 (1): 66 - 70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-999449.

60. Edwards R.L., Nicholson H.O. The management of the unstable lie in late pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1969; 76 (8): 713 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1969.tb06163.x.

61. Wilmink F.A., Hukkelhoven C.W.P.M., Lunshof S., Mol B.W.J., van der Post J.A.M., Papatsonis D.N.M. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202 (3): 250.e1 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.052.

62. Bingham J., Chauhan S.P., Hayes E., Gherman R., Lewis D. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65 (3): 183 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181cb8fbc.

63. Kleitman V., Feldman R., Walfisch A., Toledano R., Sheiner E. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: is it predictable? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 294 (6): 1161 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4139-1.

64. Sentilhes L., M.-V., Boulogne A.-I., Deneux-Tharaux C., Fuchs F., Legendre G., et al. [Shoulder dystocia: Guidelines for clinical practice--Short text]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015; 44 (10): 1303 - 10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.053.

65. Moore H.M., Reed S.D., Batra M., Schiff M.A. Risk factors for recurrent shoulder dystocia, Washington state, 1987 - 2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198 (5): e16 - 24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.050.

66. Клинические рекомендации РОДВК по ведению больных инфекциями, передаваемыми половым путем, и урогенитальными инфекциями.: Издательский дом Деловой Экспресс, 2012: 1 - 112.

67. M.-V., Anselem O., Picone O., Renesme L., N., Vauloup-Fellous C., et al. Prevention and management of genital herpes simplex infection during pregnancy and delivery: Guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 224: 93 - 101. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.011.

68. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. No. 82 June 2007. Management of herpes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109(6): 1489 - 98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000263902.31953.3e.

69. Warszawski J., Tubiana R., Le Chenadec J., Blanche S., Teglas J.-P., Dollfus C., et al. Mother-to-child HIV transmission despite antiretroviral therapy in the ANRS French Perinatal Cohort. AIDS. 2008; 22 (2): 289 - 99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3d63c.

70. Venkatesh K.K., Morrison L., Livingston E.G., Stek A., Read J.S., Shapiro D.E., et al. Changing Patterns and Factors Associated With Mode of Delivery Among Pregnant Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131 (5): 879 - 90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002566.

71. NICE Caesarean section Clinical guideline Published: 23 November 2011Last updated August 2019.

72. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133 (1): e1 - 25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018.

73. RCOG. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. Green-top Guideline No. 31 2nd Edition. RCOG, 2013.

74. Selin L., Wennerholm U.-B., Jonsson M., Dencker A., Wallin G., Wiberg-Itzel E., et al. High-dose versus low-dose of oxytocin for labour augmentation: a randomised controlled trial. Women and Birth. 2019; 32 (4): 356 - 63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.09.002.

75. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 712, August 2017: Intrapartum Management of Intraamniotic Infection.

76. ACOG. Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation, and General Management Principles Replaces Practice Bulletin Number 70, December 2005. Reaffirmed 2017.

77. Grobman W.A., Bailit J., Lai Y., Reddy U.M., Wapner R.J., Varner M.W., et al. Defining failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218 (1): 122.e1 - 122.e8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.556.

78. Lefebvre A., Saliou P., Lucet J.C., Mimoz O., Keita-Perse O., Grandbastien B., et al. Preoperative hair removal and surgical site infections: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hosp Infect. 2015; 91(2): 100 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.020.

79. Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 382: Fetal Monitoring Prior to Scheduled Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110 (4): 961 - 2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000263933.13135.43.

80. , Sevim S., Duygu E., A., Bakar Y. The effects of short-term use of compression stockings on health related quality of life in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016; 28 (7): 1988 - 92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1988.

81. Sood P.K., Cooper P.J., Michel M.Z., Wee M.Y., Pickering R.M. Thromboembolic deterrent stockings fail to prevent hypotension associated with spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1996; 5 (3): 172 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0959-289x(96)80027-6.

82. Rasmussen K.C., Secher N.H., Pedersen T. Effect of perioperative crystalloid or colloid fluid therapy on hemorrhage, coagulation competence, and outcome: A systematic review and stratified meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95 (31): e4498. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004498.

83. Melchor J., Espinosa , Hurtado E., Casans R., Navarro R., Abad Gurumeta A., et al. Colloids versus crystalloids in the prevention of hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia in elective cesarean section. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015; 81 (9): 1019 - 30.

84. ACOG The Use and Development of Checklists in Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Number 680, November 2016.

85. Практическое руководство по использованию контрольного перечня ВОЗ по хирургической безопасности, 2009 г.

86. Tuuli M.G., Liu J., Stout M.J., Martin S., Cahill A.G., Odibo A.O., et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Skin Antiseptic Agents at Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374 (7): 647 - 55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1511048.

87. Ward H.R., Jennings O.G., Potgieter P., Lombard C.J. Do plastic adhesive drapes prevent post caesarean wound infection? J Hosp Infect. 2001; 47 (3): 230 - 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0843.

88. Darouiche R.O., Wall M.J., Itani K.M.F., Otterson M.F., Webb A.L., Carrick M.M., et al. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362 (1): 18 - 26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810988.

89. Caissutti C., Saccone G., Zullo F., Quist-Nelson J., Felder L., Ciardulli A., et al. Vaginal Cleansing Before Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130 (3): 527 - 38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002167.

90. Roeckner J.T., Sanchez-Ramos L., Mitta M., Kovacs A., Kaunitz A.M. Povidone-iodine 1% is the most effective vaginal antiseptic for preventing post-cesarean endometritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221 (3): 261.e1 - 261.e20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.002.

91. Mathai M., Hofmeyr G.J., Mathai N.E. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013; (5): CD004453. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004453.pub3.

92. Hasselgren P.O., Hagberg E., Malmer H., A., Seeman T. One instead of two knives for surgical incision. Does it increase the risk of postoperative wound infection? Arch Surg. 1984; 119 (8): 917 - 20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390200037009.

93. Holmgren G., L., Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78 (7): 615 - 21.

94. Wallin G., Fall O. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106 (3): 221 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08234.x.

95. Dahlke J.D., Mendez-Figueroa H., Rouse D.J., Berghella V., Baxter J.K., Chauhan S.P. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209 (4): 294 - 306. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.043.

96. Kadir R.A., Khan A., Wilcock F., Chapman L. Is inferior dissection of the rectus sheath necessary during Pfannenstiel incision for lower segment Caesarean section? A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 128 (1 - 2): 262 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.018.

97. CORONIS Collaborative Group, Abalos E., Addo V., Brocklehurst P., El Sheikh M., Farrell B., et al. Caesarean section surgical techniques (CORONIS): a fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2013; 382 (9888): 234 - 48. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60441-9.

98. CORONIS collaborative group, Abalos E., Addo V., Brocklehurst P., El Sheikh M., Farrell B., et al. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016; 388 (10039): 62 - 72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00204-X.

99. Calvache J.A., M.F., Baron F.J. Hemodynamic effects of a right lumbar-pelvic wedge during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011; 20 (4): 307 - 11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.06.010.

100. Cluver C., Novikova N., Hofmeyr G.J., Hall D.R. Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013; (3): CD007623. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007623.pub3.

101. O'Neill H.A., Egan G., Walsh C.A., Cotter A.M., Walsh S.R. Omission of the bladder flap at caesarean section reduces delivery time without increased morbidity: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 174: 20 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.020.

102. O'Boyle A.L., Mulla B.M., Lamb S. V, Greer J.A., Shippey S.H., Rollene N.L. Urinary symptoms after bladder flap at the time of primary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial (RTC). Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29 (2): 223 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3369-5.

103. Кесарево сечение. Проблемы абдоминального акушерства: руководство для врачей/под общ. ред. Краснопольского В.И.- 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: СИМК; 2018. - 224 с.

104. Kan A. Classical Cesarean Section. Surg J. 2020; 06 (S02): S98 - 103. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402072.

105. Saad A.F., Rahman M., Costantine M.M., Saade G.R. Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211 (6): 684. e1 - 11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.050.

106. Xodo S., Saccone G., Cromi A., Ozcan P., Spagnolo E., Berghella V. Cephalad-caudad versus transverse blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision during cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 202: 75 - 80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.035.

107. Cenksoy P.O., Ficicioglu C., Yesiladali M., Kizilkale O. The Diagnosis and Management of Asherman's Syndrome Developed after Cesarean Section and Reproductive Outcome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 2013: 450658. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/450658.

108. Ferrari A., Frigerio L., Origoni M., Candotti G., Mariani A., Petrone M.M. Modified Stark Procedure for Cesarean Section. J Pelvic Med Surg. 1996; 2 (5): 239 - 344.

109. Landesman R., Graber E.A. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 148 (6): 707 - 10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(84)90551-9.

110. Fong Y.F., Arulkumaran S. Breech extraction--an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 56 (2): 183 - 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(96)02817-2.

111. Saleh H.S., Kassem G.A., Mohamed M.E.S., Ibrahiem M.A., El Behery M.M. Pull Breech out versus Push Impacted Head up in Emergency Cesarean Section: A Comparative Study. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 04 (06): 260 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2014.46042.

112. Jeve Y.B., Navti O.B., Konje J.C. Comparison of techniques used to deliver a deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016; 123 (3): 337 - 45. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13593.

113. Pelosi M.A., Apuzzio J. Use of the soft, silicone obstetric vacuum cup for delivery of the fetal head at cesarean section. J Reprod Med. 1984; 29 (4): 289 - 92.

114. Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence "Caesarean section" National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. November 2011.

115. Waterfall H., Grivell R.M., Dodd J.M. Techniques for assisting difficult delivery at caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016; 2016 (1): CD004944. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004944.pub3.

116. Elshwaikh S.L., Elsokary A.A., Abuhamama A.M. Internal podalic version for delivery of high floating head during cesarean section and neonatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019; 45 (7): 1328 - 33. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.13979.

117. Warenski J.C. A technique to facilitate delivery of the high-floating head at cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 139 (6): 625 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(81)90473-7.

118. Bofill J.A., Lencki S.G., Barhan S., Ezenagu L.C. Instrumental delivery of the fetal head at the time of elective repeat cesarean: a randomized pilot study. Am J Perinatol. 2000; 17 (5): 265 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-10009.

119. Dodd J.M., Anderson E.R., Gates S., Grivell R.M. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014; (7): CD004732. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3.

120. Anorlu R.I., Maholwana B., Hofmeyr G.J. Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2008; (3): CD004737. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004737.pub2.

121. Kamel A., El-Mazny A., Salah E., Ramadan W., Hussein A.M., Hany A. Manual removal versus spontaneous delivery of the placenta at cesarean section in developing countries: a randomized controlled trial and review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31 (24): 3308 - 13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1369522.

122. Gallos I., Williams H., Price M., Pickering K., Merriel A., Tobias A., et al. Uterotonic drugs to prevent postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2019; 23 (9): 1 - 356. https://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta23090.

123. WHO recommendations: uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. World Heal Organ. 2018; 53 p.

124. Berlit S., Nickol J., Weiss C., Tuschy B., Mayer J., M., et al. Cervical dilatation and curettage in elective caesarean section. A retrospective analysis. In Vivo. 2013; 27 (5): 661 - 5.

125. Cromi A., Ghezzi F., Di Naro E., Siesto G., Loverro G., Bolis P. Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199 (3): 292. e1 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.013.

126. Zaphiratos V., George R.B., Boyd J.C., Habib A.S. Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair for Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2015; 62 (11): 1209 - 20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-015-0448-2.

127. Vachon-Marceau C., Demers S., Bujold E., Roberge S., Gauthier R.J., Pasquier J.-C., et al. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217 (1): 65.e1 - 65.e5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.042.

128. Roberge S., Demers S., Berghella V., Chaillet N., Moore L., Bujold E. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211 (5): 453 - 60. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.014.

129. Di Spiezio Sardo A., Saccone G., McCurdy R., Bujold E., Bifulco G., Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50 (5): 578 - 83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17401.

130. Bamigboye A.A., Hofmeyr G.J. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014; (8): CD000163. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000163.pub2.

131. Lyell D.J., Caughey A.B., Hu E., Blumenfeld Y., El-Sayed Y.Y., Daniels K. Rectus muscle and visceral peritoneum closure at cesarean delivery and intraabdominal adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206 (6): 515. e1 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.033.

132. Rahbari N.N., Knebel P., Diener M.K., Seidlmayer C., Ridwelski K., H., et al. Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery - Is there any consensus? BMC Surg. 2009; 9: 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-9-8.

133. Martin E.K., Beckmann M.M., Barnsbee L.N., Halton K.A., Merollini K., Graves N. Best practice perioperative strategies and surgical techniques for preventing caesarean section surgical site infections: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. BJOG. 2018; 125 (8): 956 - 64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15125.

134. Smid M.C., Dotters-Katz S.K., Grace M., Wright S.T., Villers M.S., Hardy-Fairbanks A., et al. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130 (5): 969 - 78. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002259.

135. Mackeen A.D., Schuster M., Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212 (5): 621. e1 - 10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.020.

136. Chestnut D., Wong C., Tsen L., Kee W., Beilin Y., Mhyre J. Chestnut's Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice, 5th Edition. Elsevier Science; 2014. 1304 p.

137. Suresh M. [et al.]., editor. Shnider and Levinson's anesthesia for obstetrics. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. 861 p.

138. Ouzounian J.G., Elkayam U. Physiologic changes during normal pregnancy and delivery. Cardiol Clin. 2012; 30 (3): 317 - 29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2012.05.004.

139. Серов В.Н., Адамян Л.В., Филиппов О.С., Артымук Н.В., Белокриницкая Т.Е., Кан Н.Е., et al. Клинические рекомендации (протокол лечения) "Кесарево сечение. Показания, методы обезболивания, хирургическая техника, антибиотикопрофилактика, ведение послеоперационного периода". 2016. - 38 с. Москва;

140. Адамян Л.В., Артымук Н.В., Баев О.Р., Белокриницкая Т.Е., Краснопольский В.И., Куликов А.В., et al. Анестезия при операции кесарева сечения. Проблемы репродукции. 2018; 24 (S6): 522 - 50.

141. Oxford Textbook of Obstetric Anaesthesia/Ed. V. Clark, M. Van de Velde, R. Fernando - Oxford University Press. - 2016. - 987 p.

142. Пырегов А.В., Шифман Е.М., Кан Н.Е., Петров С.В. Трудные дыхательные пути в акушерстве. 2012. - 47 с. ООО "Интел. Москва;

143. Koo C.Y., Hyder J.A., Wanderer J.P., Eikermann M., Ramachandran S.K. A meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of postoperative mortality using the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system. World J Surg. 2015; 39 (1): 88 - 103. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2783-9.

144. Mayhew D., Mendonca V., Murthy B.V.S. A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74 (3): 373 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14569.

145. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI), Hartle A., Anderson E., Bythell V., Gemmell L., Jones H., et al. Checking anaesthetic equipment 2012: association of anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2012; 67 (6): 660 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07163.x.

146. Goneppanavar U., Prabhu M. Anaesthesia machine: checklist, hazards, scavenging. Indian J Anaesth. 2013; 57 (5): 533 - 40. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.120151.

147. A practical approach to obstetric anesthesia/ed., Curtis L. Baysinger, Brenda A. Bucklin, David R. Gambling.: 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2016, 2009p.

148. Lambert E., Carey S. Practice Guideline Recommendations on Perioperative Fasting: A Systematic Review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016; 40 (8): 1158 - 65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148607114567713.

149. Lin F.-T., Lin T.-R., Liao C.-W., Chen S.-H. [A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Pros and Cons of Consuming Liquids Preoperatively]. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2017; 64 (4): 79 - 88. https://dx.doi.org/10.6224/JN.000057.

150. Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016; 124 (2): 270 - 300. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935.

151. Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Tas. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126 (3): 376 - 93. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452.

152. Becke K., M., Girard T. [Anaesthesia Induction in Non-fasting Patients - the Example of Pregnant Women and Children]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2019; 54 (10): 617 - 28. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0720-3936.

153. Wilson R.D., Caughey A.B., Wood S.L., Macones G.A., Wrench I.J., Huang J., et al. Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219 (6): 523.e1 - 523.e15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.015.

154. Noba L., Wakefield A. Are carbohydrate drinks more effective than preoperative fasting: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Clin Nurs. 2019; 28 (17 - 18): 3096 - 116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14919.

155. Zychowicz A., Pisarska M., A., M., Witowski J., Kisielewski M., et al. Patients' opinions on enhanced recovery after surgery perioperative care principles: a questionnaire study. Wideochirurgia i inne Tech maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery other miniinvasive Tech. 2019; 14 (1): 27 - 37. https://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.77261.

156. Chon T., Ma A., Mun-Price C. Perioperative Fasting and the Patient Experience. Cureus. 2017; 9 (5): e1272. https://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1272.

157. ASA Committee on Occupational Health Task Force on Infection Control. American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Occupational Health Task Force on Infection Control. Anesthesiology. 2007.

158. Xu S., Shen X., Liu S., Yang J., Wang X. Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98 (5): e14331. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014331.

159. Heesen M., S., Rossaint R., Straube S. Prophylactic phenylephrine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014; 69 (2): 143 - 65. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12445.

160. Siddik-Sayyid S.M., Taha S.K., Kanazi G.E., Aouad M.T. A randomized controlled trial of variable rate phenylephrine infusion with rescue phenylephrine boluses versus rescue boluses alone on physician interventions during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2014; 118 (3): 611 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000437731.60260.ce.

161. Erango M., Frigessi A., Rosseland L.A. A three minutes supine position test reveals higher risk of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension during cesarean delivery. An observational study. F1000Research. 2018; 7: 1028. https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15142.1.

162. Chooi C., Cox J.J., Lumb R.S., Middleton P., Chemali M., Emmett R.S., et al. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2017; 8: CD002251. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub3.

163. Fitzgerald J.P., Fedoruk K.A., Jadin S.M., Carvalho B., Halpern S.H. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75 (1): 109 - 21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14841.

164. Eichhorn J.H., Cooper J.B., Cullen D.J., Maier W.R., Philip J.H., Seeman R.G. Standards for patient monitoring during anesthesia at Harvard Medical School. JAMA. 1986; 256 (8): 1017 - 20.

165. Jing C., Wang C. Combining Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia versus Single-Shot Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-Analysis of 5 Randomized Controlled Trials. Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25: 2859 - 67. https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.913744.

166. Houthoff Khemlani K., Weibel S., Kranke P., Schreiber J.-U. Hypnotic agents for induction of general anesthesia in cesarean section patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018; 48: 73 - 80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.04.010.

167. Klimek M., Rossaint R., van de Velde M., Heesen M. Combined spinal-epidural vs. spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73 (7): 875 - 88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14210.

168. Heesen M., J., Brinck E.C. V, Kontinen V.K., S., Rossaint R., et al. Intravenous ketamine during spinal and general anaesthesia for caesarean section: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015; 59 (4): 414 - 26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aas.12468.

169. Afolabi B.B., Lesi F.E.A. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012; 10: CD004350. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.

170. Kang H.W., Kim W.Y., Jin S.J., Kim Y.H., Min T.J., Lee Y.S., et al. Clinical evaluation of anesthesia for high-risk cesarean section at a tertiary medical center: retrospective study for 8 years (2009 - 2016). J Int Med Res. 2019; 47 (9): 4365 - 73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519859749.

171. Edipoglu I.S., Celik F., Marangoz E.C., Orcan G.H. Effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean section for foetal distress. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (11): e0207388. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207388.

172. Chestnut's Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice 6th Edition/D.H. Chestnut et al. - Elsevier - 2019 - 1382 p. Shnider and Levinson's anesthesia for obstetrics. - 5th ed./editor, M. Suresh [et al.]/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins - 2013 - 861 p.

173. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section/Ed. G. Capogna. - Springer Intern. Publ. Switz. - 2017. - 224 p.

174. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133 (3): e208 - 25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003132.

175. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 177: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129 (4): e73 - 89. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002018.

176. Fuchs F., Benhamou D. [Post-partum management after cesarean delivery. Guidelines for clinical practice]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015; 44(10): 1111 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.020.

177. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации N 919н от 15.11.12. Об утверждении Порядка оказания медицинской помощи взрослому населению по профилю "анестезиология и реаниматология".

178. Capogna G., editor. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. 224 p. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42053-0.

179. Ng K., Parsons J., Cyna A.M., Middleton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2004; (2): CD003765. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003765.pub2.

180. Kinsella S.M., Carvalho B., Dyer R.A., Fernando R., McDonnell N., Mercier F.J., et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018; 73 (1): 71 - 92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.14080.

181. Practice Advisory for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Infectious Complications Associated with Neuraxial Techniques: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Infectious Complications Associated with Neuraxi. Anesthesiology. 2017; 126 (4): 585 - 601. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001521.

182. Visalyaputra S., Rodanant O., Somboonviboon W., Tantivitayatan K., Thienthong S., Saengchote W. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia: a prospective randomized, multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101 (3): 862 - 8, table of contents. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000160535.95678.34.

183. Carvalho B., Collins J., Drover D.R., Atkinson Ralls L., Riley E.T. ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2011; 114 (3): 529 - 35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318209a92d.

184. Lim G., Facco F.L., Nathan N., Waters J.H., Wong C.A., Eltzschig H.K. A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2018; 129 (1): 192 - 215. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002182.

185. Sng B.L., Sia A.T.H. Maintenance of epidural labour analgesia: The old, the new and the future. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017; 31 (1): 15 - 22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.002.

186. Marucci M., Fiore T. Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. Current evidence. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004; 70 (9): 643 - 50.

187. Leveno K.J., Nelson D.B., McIntire D.D. Second-stage labor: how long is too long? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214 (4): 484 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.926.

188. Jung H., Kwak K.-H. Neuraxial analgesia: a review of its effects on the outcome and duration of labor. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013; 65 (5): 379 - 84. https://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.65.5.379.

189. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids, Horlocker T.T., Burton A.W., Connis R.T., Hughes S.C., Nickinovich D.G., et al. Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration. Anesthesiology. 2009; 110 (2): 218 - 30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818ec946.

190. Auroy Y., Benhamou D., Bargues L., Ecoffey C., Falissard B., Mercier F.J., et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional Anesthesia Hotline Service. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97 (5): 1274 - 80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200211000-00034.

191. Russell I.F. A prospective controlled study of continuous spinal analgesia versus repeat epidural analgesia after accidental dural puncture in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012; 21 (1): 7 - 16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.10.005.

192. Kopp S.L., Horlocker T.T., Warner M.E., Hebl J.R., Vachon C.A., Schroeder D.R., et al. Cardiac arrest during neuraxial anesthesia: frequency and predisposing factors associated with survival. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100 (3): 855 - 65, table of contents. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000144066.72932.B1.

193. Jang Y.-E., Do S.-H., Song I.-A. Vasovagal cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section - A case report-. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013; 64 (1): 77 - 81. https://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.77.

194. Furst S.R., Reisner L.S. Risk of high spinal anesthesia following failed epidural block for cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth. 1995; 7 (1): 71 - 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(94)00020-5.

195. Lee L.A., Posner K.L., Domino K.B., Caplan R.A., Cheney F.W. Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101 (1): 143 - 52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200407000-00023.

196. Mellin-Olsen J., Staender S., Whitaker D.K., Smith A.F. The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27 (7): 592 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833b1adf.

197. Devroe S., Van de Velde M., Rex S. General anesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015; 28 (3): 240 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000185.

198. Chatmongkolchart S., Prathep S. Supplemental oxygen for caesarean section during regional anaesthesia. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016; 3: CD006161. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006161.pub3.

199. A., Deakin C.D., Soar J., Khalifa G.E.A., Alfonzo A., Bierens J.J.L.M., et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 148 - 201. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.017.

200. 200. Jeejeebhoy F.M., Zelop C.M., Lipman S., Carvalho B., Joglar J., Mhyre J.M., et al. Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 132 (18): 1747 - 73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000300.

201. Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Office Department of Health, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die. Report on confidential enquires into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 2000 - 2002. London: The Stati.

202. Fischer C., Bonnet M.P., Girault A., Le Ray C. Update: Focus in-hospital maternal cardiac arrest. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019; 48 (5): 309 - 14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.02.007.

203. Chu J., Johnston T.A., Geoghegan J., Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Maternal Collapse in Pregnancy and the Puerperium: Green-top Guideline No. 56. BJOG. 2020; 127 (5): e14 - 52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15995.

204. Moitra V.K., Einav S., Thies K.-C., Nunnally M.E., Gabrielli A., Maccioli G.A., et al. Cardiac Arrest in the Operating Room. Anesth Analg. 2018; 127 (3): e49 - 50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000003552.

205. McEvoy M.D., Thies K.-C., Einav S., Ruetzler K., Moitra V.K., Nunnally M.E., et al. Cardiac Arrest in the Operating Room. Anesth Analg. 2018; 126 (3): 889 - 903. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002595.

206. Hinkelbein J., Andres J., Thies K.-C., DE Robertis E. Perioperative cardiac arrest in the operating room environment: a review of the literature. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017; 83 (11): 1190 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11802-X.

207. Jeejeebhoy F.M., Zelop C.M., Windrim R., Carvalho J.C.A.A., Dorian P., Morrison L.J. Management of cardiac arrest in pregnancy: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2011; 82 (7): 801 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.028.

208. Lee S.W.Y., Khaw K.S., Ngan Kee W.D., Leung T.Y., Critchley L.A.H. Haemodynamic effects from aortocaval compression at different angles of lateral tilt in non-labouring term pregnant women. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109 (6): 950 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes349.

209. Drukker L., Hants Y., Sharon E., Sela H.Y., Grisaru-Granovsky S. Perimortem cesarean section for maternal and fetal salvage: concise review and protocol. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93 (10): 965 - 72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12464.

210. Dohi S., Ichizuka K., Matsuoka R., Seo K., Nagatsuka M., Sekizawa A. Coronary perfusion pressure and compression quality in maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in supine and left-lateral tilt positions: A prospective, crossover study using mannequins and swine models. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 216: 98 - 103. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.019.

211. Murphy C.J., McCaul C.L., Thornton P.C. Maternal collapse secondary to aortocaval compression. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015; 24 (4): 393 - 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.05.007.

212. Butcher M., Ip J., Bushby D., Yentis S.M. Efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the supine position with manual displacement of the uterus vs lateral tilt using a firm wedge: a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2014; 69 (8): 868 - 71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.12714.

213. Zelop C.M., Einav S., Mhyre J.M., Martin S. Cardiac arrest during pregnancy: ongoing clinical conundrum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219 (1): 52 - 61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.232.

214. Wang M., Lu X., Gong P., Zhong Y., Gong D., Song Y. Open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27 (1): 116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0690-7.

215. Liao X., Chen B., Tang H., Wang Y., Wang M., Zhou M. [Effects between chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Meta-analysis]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018; 30 (11): 1017 - 23. https://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.011.002.

216. Zhu N., Chen Q., Jiang Z., Liao F., Kou B., Tang H., et al. A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Crit Care. 2019; 23 (1): 100. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2389-6.

217. Zhan L., Yang L.J., Huang Y., He Q., Liu G.J. Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2017; 3: CD010134. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.

218. Lafuente-Lafuente C., Melero-Bascones M. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013; (9): CD002751. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002751.pub3.

219. Рекомендации по проведению реанимационных мероприятий Европейского совета по реанимации (пересмотр 2015 г.). Под ред. Чл. корр. РАН Мороза В.В. 3-е издание, переработанное и дополненное. - М.: НИИОР, НСР, 2016. - 192 с.

220. Kleinman M.E., Goldberger Z.D., Rea T., Swor R.A., Bobrow B.J., Brennan E.E., et al. 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2018; 137 (1): e7 - 13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000539.

221. Panchal A.R., Berg K.M., J.G., Kurz M.C., Link M.S., Del Rios M., et al. 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Systems of Care: Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Cardiac Arrest Centers: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiov. Circulation. 2019; 140 (24): e895 - 903. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000733.

222. Lipman S.S., Wong J.Y., Arafeh J., Cohen S.E., Carvalho B. Transport decreases the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during simulated maternal cardiac arrest. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116 (1): 162 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826dd889.

223. Lipman S., Daniels K., Cohen S.E., Carvalho B. Labor room setting compared with the operating room for simulated perimortem cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118 (5): 1090 - 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182319a08.

224. Dijkman A., Huisman C.M.A., Smit M., Schutte J.M., Zwart J.J., van Roosmalen J.J., et al. Cardiac arrest in pregnancy: increasing use of perimortem caesarean section due to emergency skills training? BJOG. 2010; 117 (3): 282 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02461.x.

225. Lipman S.S., Cohen S., Mhyre J., Carvalho B., Einav S., Arafeh J., et al. Challenging the 4- to 5-minute rule: from perimortem cesarean to resuscitative hysterotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215 (1): 129 - 31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.043.

226. Benson M.D., Padovano A., Bourjeily G., Zhou Y. Maternal collapse: Challenging the four-minute rule. EBioMedicine. 2016; 6: 253 - 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.042.

227. Rose C.H., Faksh A., Traynor K.D., Cabrera D., Arendt K.W., Brost B.C. Challenging the 4- to 5-minute rule: from perimortem cesarean to resuscitative hysterotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213 (5): 653 - 6, 653.e1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.019.

228. Gatti F., Spagnoli M., Zerbi S.M., Colombo D., Landriscina M., Kette F. Out-of-Hospital Perimortem Cesarean Section as Resuscitative Hysterotomy in Maternal Posttraumatic Cardiac Arrest. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2014; 2014: 121562. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/121562.

229. Nanson J., Elcock D., Williams M., Deakin C.D. Do physiological changes in pregnancy change defibrillation energy requirements? Br J Anaesth. 2001; 87 (2): 237 - 9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.2.237.

230. Paterson-Brown S, Howell C. The MOET Course Manual: Managing Obstetric Emergencies and Trauma, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

231. Belletti A., Benedetto U., Putzu A., Martino E.A., Biondi-Zoccai G., Angelini G.D., et al. Vasopressors During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46 (5): e443 - 51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003049.

232. Panchal A.R., Berg K.M., Hirsch K.G., Kudenchuk P.J., Del Rios M., J.G., et al. 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: Use of Advanced Airways, Vasopressors, and Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Cardiac Arrest: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines f. Circulation. 2019; 140 (24): e881 - 94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000732.

233. Caughey A.B., Wood S.L., Macones G.A., Wrench I.J., Huang J., Norman M., et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219 (6): 533 - 44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.006.

234. Huang J., Cao C., Nelson G., Wilson R.D. A Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Principles Used for Scheduled Caesarean Delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41 (12): 1775 - 88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.05.043.

235. Berghella V. Cesarean delivery: Postoperative issues. Literature review current through: Feb 2020. This topic last updated: Oct 09, 2019.

236. Peleg D., Eberstark E., Warsof S.L., Cohen N., Ben Shachar I. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215 (3): 388. e1 - 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.035.

237. WHO recommendations on newborn health. 2017.

238. Carvalho B., Butwick A.J. Postcesarean delivery analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017; 31 (1): 69 - 79. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003.

239. Ng S.C., Habib A.S., Sodha S., Carvalho B., Sultan P. High-dose versus low-dose local anaesthetic for transversus abdominis plane block post-Caesarean delivery analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120 (2): 252 - 63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.084.

240. Champaneria R., Shah L., Wilson M.J., Daniels J.P. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016; 28: 45 - 60. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009.

241. Long J.B., Bevil K., Giles D.L. Preemptive Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26 (2): 198 - 218. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.018.

242. Abdallah F.W., Halpern S.H., Margarido C.B. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109 (5): 679 - 87. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes279.

243. M.-V., Sentilhes L., Battut A., Benhamou D., Bydlowski S., Chantry A., et al. Postpartum practice: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 202: 1 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.032.

244. Hamburger J., Beilin Y. Systemic adjunct analgesics for cesarean delivery: a narrative review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019; 40: 101 - 18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.06.009.

245. Macones G.A., Caughey A.B., Wood S.L., Wrench I.J., Huang J., Norman M., et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221 (3): 247.e1 - 247.e9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012.

246. Tashtanbekova C.B., Chuenkova E.A., Evstratov A.A., Ziganshina L.E. Use and costs of pain management in cesarian section. Kazan Med J. 2020; 101 (3): 418 - 25. https://dx.doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2020 - 418.

247. Waldron N.H., Jones C.A., Gan T.J., Allen T.K., Habib A.S. Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia and side-effects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110 (2): 191 - 200. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes431.

248. De Oliveira G.S., Almeida M.D., Benzon H.T., McCarthy R.J. Perioperative single dose systemic dexamethasone for postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115 (3): 575 - 88. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31822a24c2.

249. Eslamian L., Jalili Z., Jamal A., Marsoosi V., Movafegh A. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. J Anesth. 2012; 26 (3): 334 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540 - 012-1336-3.

250. Tan T.T., Teoh W.H.L., Woo D.C.M., Ocampo C.E., Shah M.K., Sia A.T.H. A randomised trial of the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012; 29 (2): 88 - 94. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834f015f.

251. K., Rothe C., Rosenstock C. V, Aasvang E.K., Lundstr m L.H., Lange K.H.W. Cutaneous Sensory Block Area, Muscle-Relaxing Effect, and Block Duration of the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: A Randomized, Blinded, and Placebo-Controlled Study in Healthy Volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 40 (4): 355 - 62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000252.

252. St Helens and Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust Guideline for the Management of Caesarean Section Version 9.2 November 2018 - 33p.

253. Bates S.M., Rajasekhar A., Middeldorp S., McLintock C., Rodger M.A., James A.H., et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy. Blood Adv. 2018; 2 (22): 3317 - 59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024802.

254. Клинические рекомендации "Венозные осложнения во время беременности и послеродовом периоде. Акушерская тромбоэмболия" 2022 г. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/723_1.

255. Клинические рекомендации "Нормальный послеродовый период (послеродовая помощь и обследование)" https://roag-portal.ru/projects_obstetrics.

256. Weinstein R.A., Boyer K.M. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery - When Broader Is Better. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375 (13): 1284 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1610010.

257. Gyte G.M.I., Dou L., Vazquez J.C. Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014; (11): CD008726. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub2.

258. Баев О.Р., Орджоникидзе Н.В., Тютюнник В.Л., Ушкалова Е.А., Шмаков Р.Г. Клинический протокол "Антибиотикопрофилактика при проведении абдоминального родоразрешения (кесарево сечение)". Акушерство и гинекология. 2011; (4): 15 - 6.

259. Тютюнник В.Л., Шмаков Р.Г., Кан Н.Е., Баев О.Р., Балушкина А.А. Федеральные клинические рекомендации. Антибиотикопрофилактика при абдоминальном родоразрешении. 2013. - 13 с.

260. Steinberg J.P., Braun B.I., Hellinger W.C., Kusek L., Bozikis M.R., Bush A.J., et al. Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections: results from the Trial to Reduce Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Errors. Ann Surg. 2009; 250 (1): 10 - 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad5fca.

261. Swank M.L., Wing D.A., Nicolau D.P., McNulty J.A. Increased 3-gram cefazolin dosing for cesarean delivery prophylaxis in obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213 (3): 415. e1 - 8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.030.

262. Tita A.T.N., Rouse D.J., Blackwell S., Saade G.R., Spong C.Y., Andrews W.W. Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113 (3): 675 - 82. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318197c3b6.

263. Tita A.T.N., Szychowski J.M., Boggess K., Saade G., Longo S., Clark E., et al. Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375 (13): 1231 - 41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602044.

264. Harper L.M., Kilgore M., Szychowski J.M., Andrews W.W., Tita A.T.N. Economic Evaluation of Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130 (2): 328 - 34. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002129.

265. Skeith A.E., Niu B., Valent A.M., Tuuli M.G., Caughey A.B. Adding Azithromycin to Cephalosporin for Cesarean Delivery Infection Prophylaxis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130 (6): 1279 - 84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002333.

266. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132 (3): e103 - 19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833.

267. Forse R.A., Karam B., MacLean L.D., Christou N. V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery in morbidly obese patients. Surgery. 1989; 106 (4): 750 - 6; discussion 756 - 7.

268. Pereira T.R.C., Souza F.G. De, Beleza A.C.S. Implications of pain in functional activities in immediate postpartum period according to the mode of delivery and parity: an observational study. Brazilian J Phys Ther. 21 (1): 37 - 43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2016.12.003.

269. Tulman L., Fawcett J. Return of functional ability after childbirth. Nurs Res. 37 (2): 77 - 81.

270. Bauchat J.R., Weiniger C.F., Sultan P., Habib A.S., Ando K., Kowalczyk J.J., et al. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Statement: Monitoring Recommendations for Prevention and Detection of Respiratory Depression Associated With Administration of Neuraxial Morphine for Cesarean Delivery Analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2019; 129 (2): 458 - 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004195.

271. Hobbs A., Cockerham R. General anaesthesia for operative obstetrics//Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. - 2013. - Т. 14. - N. 8. - С. 346 - 349.